National Gallery of Art Post Impressionism Gallery 83 – Slides and Collage

Image

 

West Building Main Floor Gallery 83 – National Gallery of Art Washington DC – Post Impressionism

Click on any Image Below to Launch Slide Shows and See Details

National Gallery of Art Gallery 83 Vincent Van Gogh Olive Orchard

ImageNational Gallery of Art Gallery 83 Vincent Van Gogh Olive Orchard

I love brialliant color; and because the Olive Orchard is not at all brilliantly colorful, it is my least favorite of Van Gogh’s paintings in Gallery 83 of the West Building.  Yet, I did enjoy seeing, first hand, Van Gogh’s signature swirls and twisty trees–literally in action.

This is what NGA has to say about Van Gogh’s Olive Orchard:

“Mme J. van Gogh-Bonger, the artist’s sister-in-law, Amsterdam; sold 1905 to (Paul Cassirer, Berlin); sold 1905 to Julius Stern [1859-1914], Berlin; [1] (his estate sale, Cassirer, Berlin, 22 May 1916, no. 27); bought by Moll. [2] (Dr. Alfred Gold, Berlin); sold 22 October 1929 through (Étienne Bignou, Paris) to (Alex Reid and Lefèvre, Glasgow and London) on joint account with (M. Knoedler & Co., London, New York and Paris); sold 23 May 1931 through (Galerie Étienne Bignou, Paris)to Chester Dale [1882-1962], New York;[3] bequest 1963 to NGA.

[1]Walter Feilchenfeldt, Vincent van Gogh & Paul Cassirer, Berlin: The Reception of van Gogh in Germany from 1901-1914, Zwolle, 1988, p. 110-111.

[2] Annotated sales catalogue in Harvard University library (copy NGA curatorial files). He is identified as Dr. Fritz A. Molle of Brieg, near Breslau, in the documentation provided by Bignou to Chester Dale (NGA curatorial records).

[3]Reid & Lefèvre Paintings Sold, sheet no. 291, #226/29 B1657 gives acquisition and sale date and information about half share with Knoedler (Lefèvre archives, Hyman Kreitman Research Centre, Tate Britain, TGA 2002/11, Box 283). Letter dated 15 October 1929 from Bignou documents his acquisition of the painting from Gold. (Lefèvre archives, Hyman Kreitman Research Centre, Tate Britain, TGA 2002/11, Box 228).” http://www.nga.gov/content/ngaweb/Collection/art-object-page.46627.html

Gogh, Vincent van
Dutch, 1853 – 1890
The Olive Orchard
1889
oil on canvas
overall: 73 × 92 cm (28 3/4 × 36 1/4 in.)
framed: 97.5 x 114.9 x 10.1 cm (38 3/8 x 45 1/4 x 4 in.)
Chester Dale Collection

National Gallery of Art Gallery 83 Vincent Van Gogh Girl in White

Image

National Gallery of Art Gallery 83 Vincent Van Gogh Girl in White

The Texture on the Top of the Dress and in the Flowers is Striking

This is what the NGA has to say about Van Gogh’s Girl in White:

“Mme Johanna van Gogh-Bonger [1862-1925], the artist’s sister-in-law, Amsterdam; sold August 1908 to (J.H. de Bois [C.M. van Gogh], The Hague); sold 1908 to Richard Kisling [1862-1913], Zürich;[1] Mme Hedwig Glatt-Kisling, Zürich until 1929;[2] (Max Bollag, Zürich); by whom sold 1951 to Chester Dale [1882-1962], New York;[3] bequest 1963 to NGA.

[1]Walter Feilchenfeldt, Vincent van Gogh & Paul Cassirer, Berlin, Amsterdam, 1988, p. 120. See also Silvia Volkart-Baumann, Richard Kisling (1862-1917): Ein Schweizer Samler und Kunstvermittler der Moderne, Ph.D. diss, University of Zurich, 2005, p. 56-57.

[2]According to Volkart-Baumann, the collection was dispersed in 1929. The Swiss dealer Max Bollag sold privately and then held a public auction of the Kisling collection on 18 November 1929. This painting was not included in the 1929 sale and remained with Bollag until it’s acquisition by Dale in 1951.

[3]Date and source of acquisition according to Chester Dale papers in NGA curatorial files.” http://www.nga.gov/content/ngaweb/Collection/art-object-page.46505.html

Gogh, Vincent van
Dutch, 1853 – 1890
Girl in White
1890
oil on canvas
overall: 66.7 x 45.8 cm (26 1/4 x 18 1/16 in.)
framed: 96.2 x 73.7 cm (37 7/8 x 29 in.)
Chester Dale Collection

National Gallery of Art Gallery 83 Vincent Van Gogh Roses

File:Vincent van Gogh - Roses.jpg

National Gallery of Art Gallery 83 Vincent Van Gogh Roses – I could hardly resist the urge to touch this painting.  I have seen this painting many times in books; and it is very much what I expected; yet

I could hardly resist the urge to touch this painting.

This is what NGA has to say about Van Gogh’s Roses:

Roses was painted shortly before Van Gogh’s release from the asylum at Saint–Rémy. He felt he was coming to terms with his illness—and himself. In this healing process, painting was all–important. During those final three weeks of his recovery, he wrote his brother Theo, he had “worked as in a frenzy. Great bunches of flowers, violet irises, big bouquets of roses…”

This is one of two rose paintings Van Gogh made at that time. It is among his largest and most beautiful still lifes, with an exuberant bouquet in the glory of full bloom. Although he sometimes assigned certain meanings to flowers, Van Gogh did not make a specific association for roses. It is clear, though, that he saw all blossoming plants as celebrations of birth and renewal—as full of life. That sense is underscored here by the fresh spring green of the background. The undulating ribbons of paint, applied in diagonal strokes, animate the canvas and play off the furled forms of flowers and leaves. Originally, the roses were pink—the color has faded—and would have created a contrast of complementary colors with the green. Such combinations of complements fascinated Van Gogh. The paint is very thick—so thick that both rose paintings were left behind when Van Gogh left Saint–Rémy on May 16, 1890. As he explained to Theo, “these canvases will take a whole month to dry, but the attendant here will undertake to send them off after my departure.” They arrived in Auvers by June 24.” http://www.nga.gov/content/ngaweb/Collection/art-object-page.72328.html

Gogh, Vincent van
Dutch, 1853 – 1890
Roses
1890
oil on canvas
overall: 71 x 90 cm (27 15/16 x 35 7/16 in.)
Gift of Pamela Harriman in memory of W. Averell Harriman

National Gallery of Art Gallery 83 Vincent Van Gogh La Mousmé

File:La Mousmé.JPG

If your viewing of art has been limited to that online and/or in books, be prepared for surprises when you first see the work up close and personal.  Some of the surprises are disappointments–some are the opposite.

La Mousmé was a pleasant surprise for me.

I have always been partial to Van Gogh’s work that is predominantly delft blue, orange, and sunflower yellow.  I also like his interior with clunky chairs and beds and his self-portraits with purples and greens for skin.  I was prepared to walk by La Mousmé with little more than a glance; but La Mousmé is stunning.  The photographs do not do this painting justice.  The reds are brilliant.  Her dress is a festival.  This painting has become one of my new Van Gogh favorites.

This is what the NGA has to say about La Mousme and also about Van Gogh:

“The intention and determination that inform Van Gogh’s art can be obscured by the sensational legends that have arisen about his life. The artist’s correspondence, particularly from his brief mature period of 1888 to 1890, contradicts popular lore and attests to the deliberateness, sensitivity, and integrity of his work.

“On July 29, 1888, Van Gogh wrote his younger brother Theo, an art dealer in a Parisian gallery, that “if you know what a ‘mousmé’ is (you will know when you have read Loti’s Madame Chrysanthème), I have just painted one. It took me a whole week…but I had to reserve my mental energy to do the mousmé well.” Van Gogh’s literary source was a popular novel from the period, whose story of a French man’s affair with a Japanese girl reflected the French fascination with Japanese culture. One of the book’s protagonists, a young, pretty Japanese girl, was called a mousmé in the author’s parlance, which Van Gogh took as his inspiration for this portrait of a young Provençale girl. The carefully modeled face and the vigorous linear patterns of bold complementary colors that describe the girl are stylistic devices that express Van Gogh’s sympathetic response to his young sitter. In several descriptions of the painting Van Gogh mentioned the oleander buds in her hand. The significance of the flowers is unclear but may be related to the artist’s pantheistic beliefs in natural cycles of birth and renewal.

“Van Gogh wrote that La Mousmé was one of a group of portrait studies that were “the only thing in painting that excites me to the depths of my soul, and which makes me feel the infinite more than anything else.” http://www.nga.gov/content/ngaweb/Collection/art-object-page.46626.html

Gogh, Vincent van
Dutch, 1853 – 1890
La Mousmé
1888
oil on canvas
overall: 73.3 x 60.3 cm (28 7/8 x 23 3/4 in.)
framed: 99 x 86.3 x 10.1 cm (39 x 34 x 4 in.)
Chester Dale Collection

National Gallery of Art Gallery 83 Vincent Van Gogh Self Portrait

File:Vincent van Gogh - National Gallery of Art.JPG

National Gallery of Art Gallery 83 Vincent Van Gogh Self Portrait

Click on the Palette To See UP CLOSE the Texture in the Paint Swatches

Vincent_van_Gogh_-_National_Gallery_of_Artpalettecloser

Click on the Detail To Study the Face Strokes & Color UP CLOSE

Vincent_van_Gogh_-_National_Gallery_of_ArtpalettecloserEYES

Before you visit the National Gallery of Art, go to the website and search for your favorite artist.  Find where his/her art is exhibited; and go there first.  Vincent Van Gogh and Matisse are probably my two favorite artists; yet, Van Gogh must trump Matisse because I searched for him first.  [Incidentally, at the time of this writing, the Matisse exhibit is not open].  Van Gogh is in Gallery 83.  Fortunately, that is where I launched my first visit to the National Gallery of Art.  It will require several days to tour all of the galleries at NGA.

After having seen art only in books for many, many years, I was almost afraid to see the actual paintings.  I was afraid that the work would not be as magnificent as I had imagined it to be; yet, that is not at all the case with Van Gogh’s work.  His art is even more magnificent first hand.  I knew that Van Gogh’s art is highly textured–thick, swirly, etc.; but I did not realize how brilliantly lit and colored much of his work is.  That is particularly true of this self-portrait, painted in the characteristic Van Gogh, delft blue and its complementary yellows and oranges.  The brilliance is also apparent in La Mousme, which I will discuss in another post.

Following is what the NGA site has to say about Van Gogh’s self portrait:

“The National Gallery’s self-portrait, painted at the asylum at St.-Rémy, where Van Gogh had committed himself following a mental breakdown, is among the last self-portraits he made. During his stay he suffered another collapse and remained confined in his room for more than a month, not even venturing into the garden. Once he was able to paint again, this was the first canvas he made, apparently in a single sitting. Van Gogh believed strongly that only work could restore his health. Here, as he had in two earlier self-portraits, he holds the tools that mark his identity as a painter, a palette and brushes, and he wears a painter’s smock. In his short career Van Gogh made almost 2,000 paintings and drawings and wrote more than 800 letters, most to his brother Théo, chronicling his aims and struggles as an artist. He worked long and very deliberately to perfect his art.

“The fervor and fragility of Van Gogh’s life are told on this canvas by stark contrasts of color and restless brushstrokes. Heavy lines of paint seem to emanate from his head like a wavering force field, energized by his own intensity. This background sets off the complementary colors of his green-tinged face and orange hair, keying his image to a higher pitch.  “I was thin and pale as a ghost,”  Van Gogh wrote as he described this portrait to Théo. “It is dark violet blue and the head whitish with yellow hair, so it has a color effect.”

“Van Gogh worked on a second self-portrait at about the same time. Although its background is animated with swirling brushstrokes, the more muted color scheme lends the image a calmer aspect. The artist believed, however, that the painting seen here captured  his “true character.”

Gogh, Vincent van (painter)
Dutch, 1853 – 1890
Self-Portrait
1889
oil on canvas
overall: 57.79 × 44.5 cm (22 3/4 × 17 1/2 in.)
framed: 82.9 x 69.2 x 6.7 cm (32 5/8 x 27 1/4 x 2 5/8 in.)
Collection of Mr. and Mrs. John Hay Whitney
“Vincent van Gogh is instantly recognizable by his reddish hair and beard, his gaunt features, and intense gaze Van Gogh painted some thirty-six self-portraits in the space of only ten years. Perhaps only Rembrandt produced more images of himself, and that in a career that spanned decades. For many artists, like Rembrandt and Van Gogh, the self-portrait was a critical exploration of personal realization and aesthetic achievement.
The NGA only has one of Van Gogh’s Self Portraits.  Here are others:

About the Artist

Vincent van Gogh portrait by Toulouse-LautrecToulouse-Lautrec, Vincent van Gogh,1887. Van Gogh Museum, Amsterdam.

Vincent van Gogh grew up in the southern Netherlands, where his father was a minister. After seven years at a commercial art firm, Van Gogh’s desire to help humanity led him to become a teacher, preacher, and missionary—yet without success. Working as a missionary among coal miners in Belgium, he had begun to draw in earnest; finally, dismissed by church authorities in 1880, he found his vocation in art.

Van Gogh’s earliest paintings were earth-toned scenes of nature and peasants, but he became increasingly influenced by Japanese prints and the work of the impressionists in France. In 1886 he arrived in Paris, where his real formation as a painter began. Under the influence of Camille Pissarro, Van Gogh brightened his somber palette and juxtaposed complementary colors for luminous effect. Younger artists like Henri Toulouse-Lautrec and Paul Gauguin prompted him to use color symbolically and for its emotional resonance.

Although stimulated by the city’s artistic environment, Van Gogh found life in Paris physically exhausting and moved in early 1888 to Arles. He hoped Provence’s warm climate would relax him and that the brilliant colors and strong light of the south would provide inspiration for his art. Working feverishly, Van Gogh pushed his style to greater expression with intense, energetic brushwork and saturated, complementary colors. Yet, his densely painted canvases remained connected to nature—their colors and rhythmic surfaces communicate the spiritual power he believed inhabited and shaped nature’s forms. His activity undisciplined; quite the opposite, he worked diligently to perfect his craft.

Van Gogh hoped to attract like-minded painters to Arles, but only Gauguin joined him, staying about two months. It was soon clear that their personalities and artistic temperaments were incompatible, and Van Gogh suffered a breakdown just before Christmas. In April, following periods of intense work interrupted by recurring mental disturbances, Van Gogh committed himself to a sanitarium in St.-Rémy. He painted whenever he could, believing that in work lay his only chance for sanity. After a year, he returned north to be closer to his brother Théo, who had been his constant support; in July he died of a self-inflicted gunshot wound.”http://www.nga.gov/content/ngaweb/exhibitions/1998/vangogh.html

Also see:  http://www.nga.gov/content/ngaweb/exhibitions/1998/vangogh.html